The Truth About Cigarettes.
Research done in 1978 by Dr. Ira T. Lapides into the
economics of cigarette smoking and the relationship between
health and the chemicals used in the production of
cigarettes lead to both the creation of the Gatlin-Burlier
Tobacconist, a tobacco store dedicated to chemical free
products, and to the beginning of an 18 year struggle to
inform the American public about the
chemical additives in
their cigarettes and the possible health effects of these
chemicals. His findings were presented in a brief report
which was mailed to
Federal and State elected officials,
'responsible' government agencies, newspapers, magazines,
and to radio and TV news organizations. He pushed for
labeling legislation and study committees at the State
level and was one of the first researchers to point to the
lack consumer information about the gaseous phase of
cigarette smoke.
Only the
Readers Digest, which had previously carried
anti-cigarette articles responded in a positive way to his
attempt to make the public aware that the brown stuff in the
middle of the cigarette was not 100% leaf tobacco.
In the early 1980's the Government foolishly encouraged people to switch to low tar
cigarettes without warning them that the word tar had relatively little meaning. Another
way to say it is that it would take tons of horse poop to truly disrupt the ecology of a large
pond nestled away in the isolated mountains, while a teaspoon of plutonium 231 would
be enough to change that ecology forever. So it is with tar.
'Tar is as Tar does' to paraphrase Forest Gump. The explanation as to why a greater
proportion of the population smoked during your grandfather's days and yet
had far fewer smoking related illnesses and far fewer types of smoking related
diseases is easily found in the analysis of the chemical make up of tar created from burning
tobacco verses the tar created from burning chemical additives.
Over the next 18 years, the information which should have been disclosed to the American smoking public
was hidden away from them by use of an intricate web of laws designed to keep this information hidden even
from the U.S. Congress. The fair and open debate over cigarettes was closed with the death of the FCC
Fairness Doctrine and, as a result, smokers were deprived of their right to consumer information.
After attempting to generate public debate by petitioning the Donahue Show to host an open discussion of
the issues, Dr. Lapides undertook a last ditch effort to bring the fact that cigarette and tobacco meant
different things to the public's attention by going on a
22 day hunger strike.
The two most consequential results were that the
GRAS (Generally regarded as safe) list of allowable
chemical additives for cigarettes production was removed from its the safe which held it since 1971 and read
into the Congressional Record. On the basis of a call from the ABC News show, Day One, Dr. Lapides ended
his hunger strike, and ABC NEWS produced a story which, however critical of the cigarette manufacturers,
still broke the 25 year ban on the discussion of cigarette manufacturing over the public air waves.
ABC was promptly sued following the airing of the program because, rather than sticking to the
information that they had, they simplified the appropriate statements to say that the cigarette producers
spiked their cigarettes with nicotine.* Still the production of the ABC News Day One program was the
watershed which, if repeated, would open the door for attempts to reinstitute the 'Fairness Doctrine' and thus
full public debate on smoking. This is something that the large cigarette producers would probably like to
avoid and a $10,000,000,000 lawsuit would surely stop.
Want to Quit Yet?
*Actually, other chemicals exist which influence the 'addictive' effect nicotine, and there are still others
which mimic the effects of nicotine. Although no proof that these chemicals are used in the production of
cigarettes, synthetic or reconstituted tobacco can be supplied, one can imagine that they were invented and
protected by patents so that they could be used.